Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494467›Full record

ArticleJournal of consumer policy2026

Fixing the Gap: Gendered Use of the Right to Choose Repair.

Joasia Luzak, Vanessa Mak, Helen Pluut, Joerg Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consumer policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joasia LuzakLaw School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-7340
Vanessa MakLeiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8016-7948
Helen PluutLeiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2119-6105
Joerg WeberDepartment of Economics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4396-9108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "right to choose repair" in European consumer law is central to sustainable consumption and consumer protection, yet its effectiveness depends on equitable access and enforcement across all consumer groups. While (consumer) law assumes that gender-neutral legal frameworks ensure equal protection, this premise remains empirically untested in the context of repair rights. This paper presents the first empirical study of gender's role in enforcing the right to choose repair. Based on representative survey data from 3,141 consumers in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, gender-based differences in adherence to the right to choose repair and factors shaping willingness to enforce it are analysed. Results show that women face distinct barriers, including acting less consistently with legal rights and greater sensitivity to procedural obstacles, financial costs, and conflict. The extent and significance of these gender-based barriers vary between national contexts, pointing to targeted policy responses that address gendered patterns in consumer law enforcement.

Indexed as

Consumer protectionEnforcement barriersGender equityInstitutional designRepair

Identifiers

PMID42494467
PMCPMC13391786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.