ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A qualitative exploration of quality assurance for standardized patient in China.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The educational value of standardized patient (SP) programs depends on the quality of SP performance, which in turn requires appropriate quality assurance (QA) mechanisms. However, empirical descriptions of how QA systems are organized and maintained in the Chinese context remain limited. Objective: To qualitatively examine structures, processes, challenges, and improvement strategies related to QA for SP programs in China from multiple stakeholder perspectives. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using three focus groups and 16 individual interviews ( Results: Five themes described key QA-related practices and experiences. (1) Upstream quality control in recruitment and admission, including targeted recruitment, multi-dimensional entry criteria, diverse recruitment channels, and scale adjustment. (2) Standardized yet differentiated training, comprising modular curricula, flexible training formats, educator team development, standardized materials, and tailored strategies by SP type. (3) Closed-loop assessment and monitoring through post-training evaluation, ongoing supervision, periodic re-training, and graded management. (4) Key challenges, including performance inconsistency, workforce instability, resource constraints, and cross-cultural, ethical, and technological issues. (5) Optimization strategies, including enhanced standardization, incentive and management systems, resource integration, scenario-specific measures, and iterative evaluation. Conclusion: The findings describe a context-responsive QA practices and operational experiences characterized by structured processes and continuous refinement within prevailing resource conditions. These insights may support the development and maintenance of SP programs in similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.