ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
OSCARinED: a policy and practice review of an emergency department-based critical care framework for critically ill non-trauma patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critically ill non-trauma patients are increasingly managed in the emergency department (ED) for prolonged periods because of hospital crowding, intensive care unit (ICU) capacity constraints, and diagnostic or procedural delays. During this interval, ED teams are required to provide emergency critical care (ECC) that extends beyond initial resuscitation and includes continued organ support, target-based reassessment, prevention of secondary complications, and structured handover. However, unlike trauma and cardiac arrest care, ongoing ECC for boarded non-trauma patients is less consistently supported by ED-specific practice frameworks. This Policy and Practice Review introduces OSCARinED, a pragmatic framework designed to organize ED-based ECC after initial ABCDE stabilization. OSCARinED integrates seven recurrent care domains: oxygenation and ventilation; sedation and analgesia; catecholamines, fluid therapy, and catheter management; anti-infective therapy; risk-adapted positioning and prophylaxis; electrolyte, blood gas, glucose, and nutrition management; and delirium prevention and treatment. The framework links trigger recognition and framework activation to explicit treatment targets, scheduled reassessment, documentation, and disposition planning. OSCARinED is intended as a safety bridge during ED boarding, not as a substitute for ICU admission. Its implementation may support standardization of care, reduce omission-prone tasks, improve handover reliability, and provide a structure for local quality improvement. Future studies should evaluate OSCARinED using implementation-science designs, focusing on process reliability, team performance, patient-centered outcomes, and ED operational endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.