Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494451›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

OSCARinED: a policy and practice review of an emergency department-based critical care framework for critically ill non-trauma patients.

Johann J Kemper, Mark Michael, Ines Elsemann, Leon Ghobadi, Philipp Kümpers, Michael Reindl, Bernhard Kumle, Martin Pin, Michael Bernhard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johann J KemperEmergency Department, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Mark MichaelEmergency Department, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Ines ElsemannEmergency Department, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Leon GhobadiEmergency Department, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Philipp KümpersDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Michael ReindlDepartment of Emergency and Acute Medicine, AMEOS Klinikum St Josef Oberhausen, Oberhausen, Germany.
Bernhard KumleDepartment of Emergency and Acute Medicine, Hospital of Villingen-Schwenningen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Martin PinDepartment of Emergency and Acute Medicine, Florence-Nightingale Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Michael BernhardEmergency Department, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill non-trauma patients are increasingly managed in the emergency department (ED) for prolonged periods because of hospital crowding, intensive care unit (ICU) capacity constraints, and diagnostic or procedural delays. During this interval, ED teams are required to provide emergency critical care (ECC) that extends beyond initial resuscitation and includes continued organ support, target-based reassessment, prevention of secondary complications, and structured handover. However, unlike trauma and cardiac arrest care, ongoing ECC for boarded non-trauma patients is less consistently supported by ED-specific practice frameworks. This Policy and Practice Review introduces OSCARinED, a pragmatic framework designed to organize ED-based ECC after initial ABCDE stabilization. OSCARinED integrates seven recurrent care domains: oxygenation and ventilation; sedation and analgesia; catecholamines, fluid therapy, and catheter management; anti-infective therapy; risk-adapted positioning and prophylaxis; electrolyte, blood gas, glucose, and nutrition management; and delirium prevention and treatment. The framework links trigger recognition and framework activation to explicit treatment targets, scheduled reassessment, documentation, and disposition planning. OSCARinED is intended as a safety bridge during ED boarding, not as a substitute for ICU admission. Its implementation may support standardization of care, reduce omission-prone tasks, improve handover reliability, and provide a structure for local quality improvement. Future studies should evaluate OSCARinED using implementation-science designs, focusing on process reliability, team performance, patient-centered outcomes, and ED operational endpoints.

Indexed as

bedside cognitive aidcritical careemergency critical careemergency department boardingemergency medicinehandoverimplementation frameworkpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID42494451
PMCPMC13391959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.