Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494326›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Developing Systems Thinking Competencies in Emerging Nutrition Professionals: A Case Study Across Academic, Community, and Industry Contexts.

Keagan M Ringling, Melissa Jansma, Kristina Cibuzar, Therese Liffrig, Mindy Hermann, Len F Marquart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Keagan M RinglingDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Melissa JansmaDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Kristina CibuzarDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9758-0164
Therese LiffrigDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Mindy HermannDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Len F MarquartDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreparing nutrition and dietetics professionals for the complexity of modern food, health, and environmental systems requires educational models that move beyond reductionist training. Systems thinking and transformational learning offer frameworks that support integrative, adaptive, and equity-oriented professional development. This case study describes a systems-based experiential learning pathway designed to cultivate systems literacy, leadership, and cross-sector collaboration among nutrition students.

methodsA multi-year experiential learning model was implemented within the University of [Minnesota]'s Department of [Food Science & Nutrition]. This case study design included nine sequential activities were co-designed by a student and faculty mentor using systems thinking and transformational learning principles. Activities engaged the student across community, non-profit, regulatory, agricultural, industry, teaching, and leadership contexts. Mentorship meetings, reflective journaling, and iterative feedback loops were used to assess competency development related to systems thinking, ethical decision-making, interdisciplinary collaboration, and adaptive problem-solving.

resultsExperiential learning produced outcomes at personal, institutional, and systems levels. Personally, the student developed transdisciplinary collaboration skills, systems thinking competency, reflective practice, and adaptive leadership capacity. Institutionally, the case contributed to new systems-oriented curricular components, student-led organizations, and expanded mentoring structures that embedded systems thinking into departmental culture. At the systems level, partnerships across industry, government, and non-profit organizations strengthened knowledge exchange and demonstrated how systems-trained students can facilitate cross-sector alignment, support community-engaged problem-solving, and contribute to food system innovation.

conclusionThis systems-based experiential learning model demonstrates how intentional mentorship, reflective practice, and cross-sector engagement can cultivate the competencies required for nutrition and dietetics professionals to navigate 21st-century food system challenges. Embedding systems thinking into both curricular and co-curricular structures fosters a workforce capable of leading collaborative, evidence-informed, and equity-focused change. The case provides a replicable model for integrating systems thinking into nutrition education to prepare graduates to engage effectively within complex, interconnected food, health, and environmental systems.

Indexed as

DieteticsNutritional SciencesNutritionistsProblem-Based LearningProfessional CompetenceAcademiaCurriculumHumansLeadershipMentorsModels, EducationalThinkingUniversitiesexperiential learningfood systemsnutrition educationsystems thinkingtransformational learningworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID42494326
PMCPMC13397042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.