Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494314›Full record

SynthesisGlobal change biology2026

Widespread Underestimation of Drought Impacts on River Ecosystems Due to Weak Experimental Designs.

Eva Haristoy, Charlotte Evangelista, Mathieu Buoro, Stephanie M Carlson, Arturo Elosegi, Cédric Tentelier, Albert Ruhí

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva HaristoyUniversité de Pau et Des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, ECOBIOP, Saint-Pée-sur-Nivelle, France.ORCID 0009-0006-6343-9039
Charlotte EvangelistaWater and Biodiversity Division, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway.
Mathieu BuoroUniversité de Pau et Des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, ECOBIOP, Saint-Pée-sur-Nivelle, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7053-3767
Stephanie M CarlsonDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Arturo ElosegiDepartment of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain.
Cédric TentelierUniversité de Pau et Des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, ECOBIOP, Saint-Pée-sur-Nivelle, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-4900
Albert RuhíDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-6457

Funding

E2S-UPPAINRAEInternational Associated Laboratory MacLifeU.S. National Science Foundation DEB-2047324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrologic droughts are intensifying globally due to climate change and human water demand. Although a myriad of drought impacts on river ecosystems have been described, manipulative experiments on the topic have often yielded inconclusive or inconsistent results. Here, we investigated to what extent this inconsistency could be due to uncontrolled variation in methodological choices, or to variation in how different ecological endpoints respond to drought. To this end, we developed a meta-analysis of 1284 effect sizes from 53 experiments, and estimated drought impacts on key variables of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We evaluated study design (e.g., temporal vs. spatial focus, controls, treatment characteristics), focal ecosystem endpoint and variable type (i.e., quantity, structure, function), and level of biological organization studied. We found that methodological features strongly influenced the detectability and magnitude of the estimated drought effects, with Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI) designs reporting 2× stronger impacts than simpler designs. Effects differed among measures of quantity, structure, and function; and across ecosystem endpoints, with sensitivity to drought generally increasing with trophic position. Finally, for BACI designs, responses tended to be 1.5× weaker at higher levels of organization (ecosystem) relative to lower levels (population), suggesting an important role of compensatory dynamics and functional redundancy in absorbing drought impacts. Our findings confirm that drought degrades river ecosystem structure and functioning, but effect detectability and magnitude strongly depend on experimental choices and ecological focus. Although studies with replication over space and time (e.g., BACI) require more effort, we show that they are uniquely powerful in parsing out true drought effects from confounding effects of other time-varying processes. We contend that embracing robust experimental designs that include spatio-temporal controls and multiple levels of organization would vastly improve our ability to forecast ecological consequences of global change in river ecosystems.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDroughtsEcosystemResearch DesignRiversClimate ChangeBACIbiodiversitydroughtecosystem functioningexperimental designmeta‐analysisrivers

Identifiers

PMID42494314
PMCPMC13397043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.