ArticleThe Permanente journal2026
Patient Portal Adoption Barriers in a Safety-Net Clinic: A Mixed-Methods Study With National Comparison.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient portals are central to health care communication, yet disparities in adoption persist among underserved populations. Most implementation strategies draw on general population research, but adoption mechanisms may differ substantially in safety-net settings.
methodsThis mixed-methods cross-sectional study examined portal adoption barriers at a student-run free clinic serving predominantly uninsured, Spanish-speaking adults (n = 112 patients, N = 42 practitioners), with comparison to the Health Information National Trends Survey 6 (n = 5232). Exploratory cluster analysis identified patient engagement patterns. Semistructured interviews (n = 11) contextualized quantitative findings. Logistic regression models compared behavioral predictors across settings.
resultsPortal adoption was 22.3% locally vs 66.1% nationally. Cluster analysis identified 4 engagement patterns reflecting distinct barriers, including patients with high health confidence but low information access. Qualitative interviews revealed system usability and trust barriers rather than health literacy deficits. A logistic regression model using behavioral predictors performed well nationally (area under the curve = 0.78) but poorly locally (area under the curve = 0.37), suggesting different adoption mechanisms in safety-net settings. Only 44.3% of practitioners found the portal easy to use.
conclusionsEquitable digital health implementation requires community-specific barrier assessment rather than reliance on generalized national models. System-level usability and trust barriers, rather than individual behavioral deficits, may drive low portal adoption in underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.