ArticleBrain and behavior2026
The Maintenance and Collapse of Sense of Order: A Longitudinal Study of System Justification Mechanisms Among Chinese Youth.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAgainst the background of increasing competition and expanding inequality in modern society, individuals are motivated to maintain the legitimacy and stability of existing social systems. Within this process, meritocratic beliefs, trust, and depression together constitute a dynamic mechanism through which individuals maintain psychological stability during system justification processes. However, most existing studies examining the relationships among these three variables have relied on cross-sectional designs or traditional cross-lagged analyses, making it difficult to accurately capture their longitudinal psychological dynamics.
objectiveThe present study aimed to systematically examine the longitudinal predictive relationships among meritocratic beliefs, trust, and depression among Chinese young adults using multiwave longitudinal data.
methodsThe data used in the present study were derived from the three-wave longitudinal surveys conducted by the China Family Panel Studies in 2018, 2020, and 2022. After screening for missing values and age restrictions, the final sample included 1489 valid participants between the ages of 14 and 35. Data analysis was conducted using R Studio and the RI-CLPM.
conclusionAt the level of stable between-person traits, higher trust and stronger meritocratic beliefs were both significantly associated with lower long-term baseline levels of depression. Trust and meritocratic beliefs also demonstrated a significant positive association. At the level of within-person dynamic fluctuations, trust at the previous wave significantly and positively predicted subsequent meritocratic beliefs, whereas depression at the previous wave significantly and negatively predicted subsequent meritocratic beliefs. Meritocratic beliefs did not significantly predict later changes in either trust or depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.