Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494150›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2026

Large-diameter Plastic Stents as An Option for Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Hidehito Sumiya, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hidehito SumiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-6943-6684
Yoshihide KannoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Shinsuke KoshitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Takahisa OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Hiroaki KusunoseDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Toshitaka SakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Keisuke YonamineDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Kazuaki MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Fumisato KozakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Haruka OkanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Kento HosokawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Shun NozakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Kei ItoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) are used widely for the preoperative biliary drainage of pancreatic cancer because of their low recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates. On the other hand, concerns about non-RBO adverse events (AEs), such as pancreatitis, have led to ongoing debate over the optimal stent. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the clinical outcomes of preoperative biliary drainage using plastic stents (PSs) and FCSEMSs for patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients (between June 2012 and September 2024) who underwent NAC following biliary drainage using either PSs or FCSEMSs and who were followed up until the decision for or against a surgical resection was made. Results: Forty-seven patients were included (PS, n=33; FCSEMS, n=14). The RBO rate was not significantly different (39% vs. 7.1%, p=0.081), whereas the time to RBO was significantly longer in the FCSEMS group (126 days vs. not reached, p=0.046). Non-RBO AEs were observed more frequently in the FCSEMS group (15% vs. 43%, p=0.061). The rate of overall AEs, including RBO and non-RBO AEs, was similar between the two groups (45% vs. 43%, p=1.000). Subgroup analysis between the PS ≥10 Fr (n=27) and FCSEMS groups showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Large-diameter PSs may be an alternative in selected patients at high risk of non-RBO AEs, including post-ERCP pancreatitis, but attention should be paid to the risk of RBO.

Indexed as

DrainagePancreatic NeoplasmsStentsAgedCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholestasisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPlasticsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomePlasticsEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyObstructive jaundicePancreatic cancerStents

Identifiers

PMID42494150
PMCPMC13407487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.