ArticleThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2026
Large-diameter Plastic Stents as An Option for Preoperative Biliary Drainage for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Article in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) are used widely for the preoperative biliary drainage of pancreatic cancer because of their low recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates. On the other hand, concerns about non-RBO adverse events (AEs), such as pancreatitis, have led to ongoing debate over the optimal stent. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the clinical outcomes of preoperative biliary drainage using plastic stents (PSs) and FCSEMSs for patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients (between June 2012 and September 2024) who underwent NAC following biliary drainage using either PSs or FCSEMSs and who were followed up until the decision for or against a surgical resection was made. Results: Forty-seven patients were included (PS, n=33; FCSEMS, n=14). The RBO rate was not significantly different (39% vs. 7.1%, p=0.081), whereas the time to RBO was significantly longer in the FCSEMS group (126 days vs. not reached, p=0.046). Non-RBO AEs were observed more frequently in the FCSEMS group (15% vs. 43%, p=0.061). The rate of overall AEs, including RBO and non-RBO AEs, was similar between the two groups (45% vs. 43%, p=1.000). Subgroup analysis between the PS ≥10 Fr (n=27) and FCSEMS groups showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Large-diameter PSs may be an alternative in selected patients at high risk of non-RBO AEs, including post-ERCP pancreatitis, but attention should be paid to the risk of RBO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.