ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
An Equation to Estimate PICC Catheter Length in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Equation to Estimate PICC Catheter Length in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePeripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are essential for very low birth weight infants (VLBWIs), but optimal insertion depth remains challenging. Existing estimation methods often yield suboptimal accuracy. This study aimed to develop and validate anthropometric parameter-based formulas to predict lower extremity PICC insertion depth using the first popliteal crease as an anatomical landmark in VLBWI, seeking to improve first-attempt success rates and procedural safety.
methodsA prospective study was conducted in a tertiary NICU, enrolling 329 VLBWIs who underwent lower limb PICC insertion between May 2023 and May 2024. Data collected included sex, target vein for catheterization, body weight, length, head circumference at insertion, and vertical distance from the puncture site to the first popliteal crease. Pearson correlation and linear regression analyses were performed to examine associations between anthropometric parameters and optimal catheter length. Univariate prediction formulas (weight-based, length-based, and head circumference-based models) and multivariate regression models were established. Bland-Altman analysis was used to validate model agreement.
resultsUnivariate regression analysis yielded the following: weight-based model: total insertion depth (cm) = [8.31 + (5 × body weight [kg])] ± PS-PTC distance, where "+" applies when the puncture site is distal to the popliteal crease and "-" applies when proximal; 8.31 is the regression intercept and five is the regression slope coefficient. Length-based model: total insertion depth (cm) = [1.13 + (0.35 × body length [cm])] ± PS-PTC distance; 1.13 is the intercept and 0.35 is the slope coefficient. Head circumference-based model: total insertion depth (cm) = [2.33 + (0.43 × head circumference [cm])] ± PS-PTC distance; 2.33 is the intercept and 0.43 is the slope coefficient. Multivariate regression analysis established four combination models, with Model IV (weight + length + head circumference) showing optimal performance.
conclusionAnthropometric parameter-based prediction formulas provide precise guidance for lower extremity PICC placement in VLBWI, enhancing placement success and safety. This approach supports individualized care and is especially valuable where ultrasound guidance is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.