ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Co-design in action: lessons learned from transplant patient and family engagement in an integrated knowledge translation strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted immunocompromised individuals, particularly transplant recipients. Despite their vulnerability, national- and international-level research often lacks direct input from this community. In response, the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP) implemented an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) strategy that involved patient, family, and donor (PFD) partners as co-leads and decision makers throughout the research process.
methodsBeginning in 2022, CDTRP adapted a co-engagement model to identify research priorities and inform study design, conduct, and knowledge mobilization related to COVID-19 issues for transplant recipients. Diverse stakeholders, including researchers, clinicians, policymakers, trainees, transplant-focused organizations, and PFD partners, collectively co-developed the TREAT-COVID research project. In 2022-2023 CDTRP hosted a series of four national forums that were co-designed and co-facilitated by PFD co-leads, enabling shared decision making and iterative refinement of research priorities and strategies. This paper provides an overview of the iKT strategy implemented, including objectives, engagement processes, outputs, resulting study adaptations, and lessons learned.
resultsEach forum generated new insights and actionable changes. Forum 1 identified research priorities, including clinical therapeutics, psychosocial needs, quality of life, economic burden, and recovery-related supports. Forum 2 emphasized mental health and support for transplant recipients and their caregivers. Forum 3 identified the distinct but complementary priorities of transplant recipients and their caregivers, such as clinical care and mental wellness, respectively. Forum 4 addressed barriers to recruiting study participants and refined communication strategies. These forums collectively shaped the TREAT-COVID research project by informing study priorities, data collection tools, recruitment strategies, and knowledge mobilization.
conclusionsThis paper details the iKT strategy implemented by the CDTRP to engage diverse stakeholders in COVID-19-related research for transplant communities. Meaningful and structured patient and family involvement in national health research during a public health emergency was prioritized. By involving patient and family partners in governance, facilitation, study refinement, recruitment, and dissemination, CDTRP advanced a collaborative and equity-driven iKT model. The paper contributes an operational example of national-scale patient and family co-leadership in time-sensitive research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.