Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493792›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Access to outpatient psychotherapy and utilisation of services after structural reform in Germany: analysis of administrative claims data for people with depression.

Sandra Werner, Sarah Schlierenkamp, Pauline Schlesiger, Luisa Friedrich, Carina Abels, Klemens Höfer, Dieter Best, Barbara Lubisch, Gebhard Hentschel, Franziska Weigel and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sandra WernerInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany. sandra.diekmann@stud.uni-due.de.
Sarah SchlierenkampEssener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH, Bredeneyer Straße 2b, 45133, Essen, Germany.
Pauline SchlesigerEssener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH, Bredeneyer Straße 2b, 45133, Essen, Germany.
Luisa FriedrichEssener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH, Bredeneyer Straße 2b, 45133, Essen, Germany.
Carina AbelsInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.
Klemens HöferInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.
Dieter BestDeutsche PsychotherapeutenVereinigung e.V. (DPtV), Am Karlsbad 15, 10785, Berlin, Germany.
Barbara LubischDeutsche PsychotherapeutenVereinigung e.V. (DPtV), Am Karlsbad 15, 10785, Berlin, Germany.
Gebhard HentschelDeutsche PsychotherapeutenVereinigung e.V. (DPtV), Am Karlsbad 15, 10785, Berlin, Germany.
Franziska WeigelAOK Bundesverband, Rosenthaler Straße 31, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel ThummAOK Bundesverband, Rosenthaler Straße 31, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
Dagmar WieczorekBARMER, Lichtscheider Str. 89, 42285, Wuppertal, Germany.
Ursula MarschallBARMER, Institut für Gesundheitssystemforschung, Lichtscheider Str. 89, 42285, Wuppertal, Germany.
Christa SchaffBerufsverband für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie in Deutschland e. V. (bkjpp), Rhabanusstraße 3, 55118, Mainz, Germany.
Helene TimmermannVereinigung für analytische und tiefenpsychologisch fundierte Kinder- und Jugendlichen-Psychotherapie in Deutschland e.V. (VAKJP), Kantstr. 54, 10627, Berlin, Germany.
Bettina MeiselVereinigung für analytische und tiefenpsychologisch fundierte Kinder- und Jugendlichen-Psychotherapie in Deutschland e.V. (VAKJP), Kantstr. 54, 10627, Berlin, Germany.
Anke WalendzikInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.
Jürgen WasemInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127, Essen, Germany.
Silke NeusserEssener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH, Bredeneyer Straße 2b, 45133, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly initiation of therapy can be crucial for the course of mental health problems. Among other new care elements, the structural reform of the outpatient psychotherapy system in Germany introduced psychotherapeutic consultations to enable early low-threshold access to psychotherapists. This study aims to compare access to outpatient psychotherapeutic care for patients diagnosed with a first-time diagnosis of depression before and after the reform, and to analyse the utilisation of other relevant health services.

methodsA retrospective cohort-based analysis was conducted using anonymised administrative claims data to examine the initial contact to the outpatient psychotherapeutic system for children and adolescents (under 18 years old) and adults (over 21 years old) with a first-time diagnosis of depression. Patients with at least one documented ICD-10 depression diagnosis in either the first quarter of 2016 (pre-reform) or the first quarter of 2018 (post-reform), and at least one further diagnosis within 12 months, were included in the analysis. The initial contact to outpatient psychotherapeutic care, as well as the utilisation of other relevant health care services (i.e. inpatient stay, antidepressant prescriptions, low-intensity interventions) was analysed for patients with and without initial contact. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 11,038 children and adolescents and 284,773 adults were included in the analysis. The proportion of children and adolescents and adults who had initial contact with outpatient psychotherapeutic care increased by 14 and 5 percentage points respectively between the pre- and post-reform period [both: p < 0,001]. The main effect parameters for initial contact were age, sex and the severity of depression diagnosis. The analysis revealed that, in terms of health care utilisation, patients who had an initial contact had significantly more relevant health care services such as antidepressant prescriptions or low-intensity interventions after initial contact in the post-reform period than in the pre-reform period. Those who had no initial contact used other relevant health care services less frequently in the post-reform period.

conclusionsThis analysis indicates that the outpatient psychotherapy system became more accessible for people with a first-time diagnosis of depression in terms of initial contact to psychotherapists following the reform and sheds light on the complexities of care provision for those with depression.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareDepressionHealth Care ReformHealth Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychotherapyAdolescentAdultChildFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAccessAdministrative claims dataOutpatient carePsychotherapyQuantitative dataReformUtilisation

Identifiers

PMID42493792
PMCPMC13397724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.