Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493762›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2026

Roles, Barriers and Facilitators of Multidisciplinary Teams Supporting People With Stage 3 and 4 Pressure Injuries in Hospital and Home Settings: A Scoping Review.

Daisy Kelly, Lucinda Bankowski, Suraj Chaudhari, James Pennington, Luke Wakely, Lucy Kocanda, Michelle L Kersten

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daisy KellyUniversity of Newcastle College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9818-4260
Lucinda BankowskiUniversity of Newcastle College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7167-1538
Suraj ChaudhariUniversity of Newcastle College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9079-3097
James PenningtonUniversity of Newcastle College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7713-737X
Luke WakelyDepartment of Rural Health, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-4859
Lucy KocandaDepartment of Rural Health, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-7100
Michelle L KerstenDepartment of Rural Health, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4669-2714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review examined the literature on the roles of healthcare professionals involved in multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of pressure injuries (PIs), as well as the barriers and facilitators influencing team-based care. Pressure injuries represent a significant global disease burden with physical and psychological impacts on individuals, requiring coordinated management from multiple disciplines. Understanding MDT composition, roles, and care delivery is essential to optimise patient outcomes and team performance across the care continuum. Eligible English-language papers on multidisciplinary PI care in hospital and community settings were identified through searching CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus. After duplicates were removed, the remaining articles were independently screened by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Data from 41 eligible papers were extracted and analysed thematically. MDT roles spanned wound care, rehabilitation, education, nutritional support, and care coordination, with substantial interdisciplinary overlap. Key facilitators included dedicated leadership, regular meetings, shared documentation, and ongoing training, while barriers encompassed unclear role definitions, inconsistent guidelines, poor hospital-to-community integration, and patient complexity. Critical gaps remained in psychosocial support, telehealth, and care for diverse populations. Multidisciplinary teams must be adaptable, holistic, and guided by patient experiences to optimise both healing and long-term prevention.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesPatient Care TeamPressure UlcerFemaleHumansMaleinterprofessional relationspatient care teampressure ulcerscoping reviewwound healing

Identifiers

PMID42493762
PMCPMC13395969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.