Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493760›Full record

SynthesisActa physiologica (Oxford, England)2026

Under Control? Mouse Models of Heat Exposure: A Systematic Review of Experimental Design and Methodology.

Amina H Rhaman, Leaf R Kardol, Shane K Maloney, Ebony Quintrell, Elizabeth Sorial, Shannon Morgan, Danielle J Russell, Erin Kelty, Caitlin S Wyrwoll

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta physiologica (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amina H RhamanSchool of Population & Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2856-4525
Leaf R KardolSchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4074-5512
Shane K MaloneySchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5878-2266
Ebony QuintrellSchool of Population & Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-2857
Elizabeth SorialSchool of Population & Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3814-1641
Shannon MorganMedical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2233-0383
Danielle J RussellSchool of Population & Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3366-4415
Erin KeltySchool of Population & Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-2216
Caitlin S WyrwollSchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-5680

Funding

Australian GovernmentGraduate Women Western AustraliaNational Health and Medical Research Council 2008937Stan Perron Charitable FoundationWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 227174/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse models are widely used to study heat-related physiological responses as they provide insights relevant to human health. However, species differences (including nocturnal behavior) and standard housing below the thermoneutral zone (TNZ; 26°C-34°C) can confound comparisons. This systematic review evaluates methodologies, including housing temperatures, used in mouse heat-exposure studies published over the past 4 years. Medline, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed mouse heat-exposure studies published from 2020 to 10 January 2025. Data on housing temperature, heat-exposure protocols, and physiological outcomes were extracted. Screening and extraction were conducted independently and in duplicate in Covidence. One hundred seventy studies were included. Of those, 142 (83%) housed control mice below TNZ; seven (4%) studies maintained TNZ conditions and the remainder did not report control temperature. Heat exposures ranged from 30°C-45°C, most commonly 39°C-41°C. Body temperature was measured in 110 (65%) studies, often targeting ~42°C. When timing was reported, exposures occurred mainly during the light phase (52, 30%). Most studies used males only (116, 68%); 31 (18%) used females only; 9 (5%) included both sexes; and 14 (8%) did not report sex. Common outcomes were digestive (55, 32%), inflammatory (47, 28%), and central nervous system (40, 24%). Recent mouse heat-exposure studies often compare heat-exposed animals with cold-stressed controls and apply daytime exposures that conflict with the nocturnal behavior of mice and human diurnal pattern. Incomplete reporting of housing conditions limits interpretation. Future research should account for differences between mice and humans to improve translational relevance. Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024611316.

Indexed as

Body Temperature RegulationHot TemperatureAnimalsBody TemperatureDisease Models, AnimalMiceResearch Designexperimental designheat exposuremouse modelssystematic reviewthermal stressthermoregulation

Identifiers

PMID42493760
PMCPMC13396153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.