Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493749›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2026

Thoracic ultrasound elastography in pleural and subpleural diseases: a narrative review.

Guido Marchi, Carmine Salerni, Jacopo Cefalo, Gian Piero Bandelli, Martina Ferioli, Matteo Ciracì, Piero Candoli, Michele Mondoni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guido MarchiCardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Pulmonology Unit, University Hospital of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy. guido.marchi@ao-pisa.toscana.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6122-7792
Carmine SalerniRespiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Jacopo CefaloRespiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Gian Piero BandelliInterventional Pulmonology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Martina FerioliInterventional Pulmonology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Matteo CiracìRespiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Piero CandoliInterventional Pulmonology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Michele MondoniRespiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography measures tissue stiffness and has demonstrated clinical utility across multiple medical specialties. In respiratory medicine, its application is increasingly explored for pleural and subpleural lesions, pleural effusions, and pneumothorax. This narrative review examines current evidence for thoracic ultrasound elastography, highlighting potential benefits and key limitations. Several studies suggest that elastography can differentiate malignant from benign pleural lesions and show superior sensitivity for elastography-guided versus traditional ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy. However, significant challenges hinder clinical implementation: lack of standardised protocols, variability across ultrasound systems, operator dependency, and limited multicentre validation. The "elasto-lung point" sign has been described as potentially useful for pneumothorax detection, but its incremental value beyond conventional ultrasound remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Elastography has also been preliminarily studied for non-expandable lung detection, although current evidence suggests that M-mode ultrasound may perform better. Integration with artificial intelligence holds promise to enhance future diagnostic capabilities. Overall, thoracic elastography represents an innovative approach that requires substantial validation before routine clinical use can be recommended. Future priorities include protocol standardisation, rigorous multicentre studies, and demonstration of impact on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Diagnostic imagingInterventional pulmonologyMalignant pleural effusionNonexpandable lungPleural diseasesUltrasound elastography

Identifiers

PMID42493749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.