ReviewJournal of ultrasound2026
Thoracic ultrasound elastography in pleural and subpleural diseases: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound elastography measures tissue stiffness and has demonstrated clinical utility across multiple medical specialties. In respiratory medicine, its application is increasingly explored for pleural and subpleural lesions, pleural effusions, and pneumothorax. This narrative review examines current evidence for thoracic ultrasound elastography, highlighting potential benefits and key limitations. Several studies suggest that elastography can differentiate malignant from benign pleural lesions and show superior sensitivity for elastography-guided versus traditional ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy. However, significant challenges hinder clinical implementation: lack of standardised protocols, variability across ultrasound systems, operator dependency, and limited multicentre validation. The "elasto-lung point" sign has been described as potentially useful for pneumothorax detection, but its incremental value beyond conventional ultrasound remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Elastography has also been preliminarily studied for non-expandable lung detection, although current evidence suggests that M-mode ultrasound may perform better. Integration with artificial intelligence holds promise to enhance future diagnostic capabilities. Overall, thoracic elastography represents an innovative approach that requires substantial validation before routine clinical use can be recommended. Future priorities include protocol standardisation, rigorous multicentre studies, and demonstration of impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42493749What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.