ArticleJournal of community health2026
Management of Chagas Disease in Primary Health Care: Challenges Faced by Physicians in Areas with Higher and Lower Endemicity in Brazil.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze Primary Health Care physicians' perceptions of the challenges involved in managing Chagas disease in areas with higher and lower endemicity. This qualitative study was conducted in three municipalities in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Four focus groups involving 27 physicians were carried out. Discussions were guided by a semi-structured script based on the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for Chagas Disease, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic content analysis according to Bardin, with independent double coding. The findings revealed gaps in professional training, predominance of theoretical teaching, lack of continuing education activities, and limited knowledge of the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines. Low clinical suspicion, uncertainties regarding notification of chronic Chagas disease, and the association of antiparasitic treatment primarily with the acute phase were also identified. In municipalities with higher endemicity, low rates of serological testing requests were observed, whereas in the municipality with lower endemicity, Chagas disease was less frequently considered among diagnostic hypotheses. These findings indicate that educational, clinical, and organizational weaknesses contribute to maintaining the invisibility of Chagas disease within Primary Health Care and that higher local endemicity alone does not ensure its incorporation into routine work processes. The results highlight the importance of continuing education, stronger integration between Primary Health Care and Health Surveillance, and the incorporation of clinical guidelines to enhance the capacity of Primary Health Care services to recognize, diagnose, and provide follow-up care for individuals affected by Chagas disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.