Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493677›Full record

ReviewPlanta2026

Graft incompatibility in fruit trees in early detection: integrating physiological, molecular, and technological approaches.

Muhammad Hamza, Dilek Soysal, Izhar Ullah, Yaqoob Sultan, Erol Aydin, Hüsnü Demirsoy, Heba I Mohamed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad HamzaDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey.
Dilek SoysalDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey.
Izhar UllahDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey.
Yaqoob SultanDepartment of Grass Breeding, Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, 58344, Kėdainiai, Lithuania.
Erol AydinDepartment of Horticulture, Black Sea Agricultural Research Institute, Gelemen, Samsun, Turkey.
Hüsnü DemirsoyDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey.
Heba I MohamedDepartment of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. hebaibrahim79@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6892-3376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThis review highlights that integrating physiological, molecular, imaging, and AI-based approaches enables early and reliable detection of graft incompatibility, improving rootstock-scion selection, orchard sustainability, fruit productivity, and long-term tree performance. One of the most serious problems in fruit growing is the breaking, weakening, or dying of the tree at the graft union, either within a short period of time or after 10-15 years. This condition is often triggered by environmental factors; however, it is certainly not solely caused by environmental conditions. This problem is defined as graft incompatibility. Graft incompatibility refers to the failure of successful anatomical and physiological integration between a rootstock and a scion, primarily due to biochemical, molecular, and genetic mismatches that impair vascular reconnection and long-term stability of the graft union. Graft incompatibility remains a significant constraint in fruit tree production, resulting in reduced longevity, yield, and quality of orchards. This review integrates recent advancements in physiological, molecular, and technological approaches for the early detection of graft incompatibility, with special emphasis on Prunus species such as sweet cherry. Physiological and biochemical markers, including phenolic accumulation, antioxidant enzyme activities, and isozyme patterns, serve as early indicators of incompatibility. At the molecular level, transcriptomic, metabolomic, and epigenetic analyses have revealed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and post-translational modifications associated with stress signaling, vascular reconnection, and callus formation. Imaging-based non-destructive technologies such as micro-CT, MRI, terahertz, and hyperspectral imaging now allow real-time visualization of graft-union structures without damaging plant tissues. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with multi-omics datasets and imaging tools offers unprecedented potential for predictive diagnosis and compatibility assessment. Collectively, these multidisciplinary advances are reshaping the detection and management of graft incompatibility, enabling faster, more reliable, and sustainable rootstock-scion selection in fruit tree breeding.

Indexed as

FruitPrunusTreesGraft incompatibilityMachine learning modelsMolecular markersOmics approaches

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.