ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Medico-legal interpretations of gas on postmortem CT: a scoping review.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) in forensic investigations has increased during recent years. PMCT differs from clinical CT due to the inevitable manifestation of postmortem changes that varies significantly between cases. However, differentiating between gas with an antemortem origin (e.g. gas embolism) vs. gas with a postmortem (putrefactive gas) origin presents a critical challenge in forensic medicine. This scoping review evaluated how gas distribution patterns on PMCT may aid in determining gas origin. In accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL. 10,133 records were identified, of which 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, evidence was limited and heterogeneous, with substantial variation in terminology, gas assessment methods and study populations. Evidence suggests that differentiating pathological gas from putrefactive, resuscitation-related artefacts, and postmortem effects such as off-gassing remains a significant diagnostic challenge postmortem. Nevertheless, certain early PMCT patterns may assist interpretation. Within the first 24 h postmortem, intravascular and cardiac gas more commonly reflect systemic or traumatic mechanisms, although putrefaction cannot be excluded. Isolated cardiac gas may result from resuscitation efforts, whereas combined cardiac and intrahepatic gas more strongly suggests decomposition. In diving fatalities, embolic gas findings may be compounded by postmortem off-gassing as well as decomposition changes, and should be interpreted alongside dive profiles and, where available, gas sampling. Small gas collections adjacent to laryngeal structures may indicate trauma when other sources and decomposition are excluded. Overall, integrating PMCT gas distribution with contextual information and ancillary analyses may help understand gas origin, but further targeted research is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42493670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.