ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
Volumetric Examination of Cerebellum by Automatic Segmentation Method in Individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease primarily affecting the axial skeleton and is frequently associated with postural instability, impaired balance, and altered motor control. The cerebellum plays a central role in sensorimotor integration; however, cerebellar volumetric alterations in AS remain insufficiently elucidated. This study aimed to investigate cerebellar and cerebellar lobular volumetric changes in individuals with AS using a fully automated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation method. This retrospective study included 15 patients with AS and 15 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). Brain MRI data were analyzed using the automated CERES pipeline of the volBrain platform. All cerebellar volumetric measures were normalized to intracranial volume (ICV). Group comparisons were performed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests, and multiple comparisons were controlled using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. Compared with the control group, nominal differences (p < 0.05) were observed in several cerebellar regions, including Lobule V, Lobule VI, and Lobule VIIIA. Similarly, nominal differences were identified in the gray matter volumes of Lobule I-II and Lobule VIIIA. However, none of these findings remained statistically significant after FDR correction (all q > 0.05). Cerebellar volumetric differences in AS appear to be subtle and do not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. These findings suggest that previously reported differences may reflect inter-individual variability rather than robust disease-specific structural alterations. Further studies with larger cohorts and multimodal approaches are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42493658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.