ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Scaling up genomic newborn screening: implementation lessons from the BabyScreen+ study.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in the potential of population-based genomic sequencing is growing. However, integrating a large-scale screening program into an already complex healthcare system is challenging. The implementation of gNBS needs a thorough understanding of the process. The purpose of this study is to investigate how gNBS can be integrated into the Australian health system and delivered at scale. Embedded within the BabyScreen+ study, we utilised a research design informed by process mapping and phenomenology. Fifty-one semi-structured interviews with parents (n = 33), healthcare providers (n = 15), and BabyScreen+ study team members (n = 8) were conducted. Additionally, we analysed the operational team meeting minutes. A baseline process map, developed in consultation with team members, consisted of six stages: 1. Raising awareness of the screening program; 2. Offer; 3. Participant enrolment and consent; 4. Sample collection; 5. Testing; and 6. Result disclosure and management. We recorded changes made over the study period to inform the post-implementation process map. Most changes occurred at stages: 1. Raising awareness, 4. Sample collection and 5. Testing. Lastly, a process map to inform the scale up of screening, was developed. Four key aspects of the gNBS process needing modification are: (1) growing awareness of screening amongst the public and HCPs; (2) building flexibility and accessibility into the consent process; (3) developing automation capabilities and infrastructure for large-scale sequencing and analysis, and (4) dedicated referral processes for infants who receive high-chance results. These findings demonstrate key system-level considerations and provide a foundation for implementing genomic newborn screening at scale within existing healthcare systems.
Identifiers
42493629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.