ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Comments on "Single-Stage Reconstruction with a Bilayer Artificial Dermal Regeneration Matrix for Nasal Skin Malignancies Defects in Middle-Aged and Elderly Asian Patients: Minimizing Scarring and Morbidity".
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor, Discussion on: "Saying No in Aesthetic Surgery: Ethical Framework for Declining High-Stakes Requests".Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We read with great interest the article "Single-stage reconstruction with a bilayer artificial dermal regeneration matrix for nasal skin malignancies defects in middle-aged and elderly Asian patients: minimizing scarring and morbidity" published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. The authors presented an innovative reconstructive strategy aimed at reducing donor-site morbidity and improving aesthetic outcomes following excision of nasal skin malignancies. Their findings suggest that the use of a bilayer artificial dermal regeneration matrix may offer promising cosmetic and functional results in carefully selected patients. Nevertheless, several methodological limitations should be considered when interpreting the reported outcomes and assessing the broader applicability of the technique.No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42493594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.