Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493558›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2026

The cardiac 4D nucleome: nuclear and chromatin dynamics across development, disease and ageing.

Yinuo Wang, Gergana Dobreva

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yinuo WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Genomics and Epigenomics, European Center for Angioscience (ECAS), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. Yinuo.Wang@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6653-6014
Gergana DobrevaDepartment of Cardiovascular Genomics and Epigenomics, European Center for Angioscience (ECAS), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. Gergana.Dobreva@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4814-9416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleus is a highly organized and dynamic organelle, with hierarchical layers ranging from nucleosome positioning to chromatin domains and higher-order 3D genome topology. Viewed over time as the 4D nucleome, this organization enables precise and context-dependent transcriptional control. In the heart, dynamic nuclear architecture orchestrates precise transcriptional programmes that control lineage commitment and the establishment of cardiac cell types crucial not only for heart development, but also for postnatal function and adaptive responses. Correspondingly, transitions between developmental and disease states are accompanied by coordinated changes in genome organization, chromatin accessibility and transcription factor occupancy. These architectural programmes are modulated by mechanical and metabolic inputs, which further shape chromatin organization, nuclear positioning and epigenetic state. Deciphering the 4D nucleome of the heart can potentially provide new insights into disease mechanisms, regenerative strategies and precision cardiovascular medicine. In this Review, we highlight studies that define the fundamental principles of nuclear organization; explore nuclear and chromatin reorganization during cardiac development, disease and ageing; and discuss emerging methods to interrogate nuclear architecture. We also consider how mechanical and metabolic signals shape the 4D epigenome and examine their therapeutic and translational implications for cardiovascular health and disease.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.