ArticleNature communications2026
Creatinine assay interferences compromises MELD accuracy and may bias liver allocation.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is widely used to prioritize patients for liver transplantation and to estimate short-term mortality in end-stage liver disease. Inaccuracies in serum creatinine measurements, particularly interference from bilirubin, both key components of the MELD, may influence clinical decision-making. However, standardized approaches to address such analytical bias are lacking. Here we show that bilirubin-related interference leads to clinically relevant MELD distortions and associated outcomes. We developed a correction model using controlled in vitro matrices and validated it against representative patient samples. The model was applied to a large cohort from registry data and a separate clinical population. After correction, clinically meaningful score shifts occurred in a substantial proportion of patients, with lower corrected scores associated with altered transplantation probability and mortality estimates. These findings highlight the importance of harmonized, interference-resistant creatinine assays to improve fairness and accuracy in liver transplant allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.