Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493472›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Impact of Regional Hepatic Immunosuppression With Budesonide on Bacterial Elimination in Porcine Abdominal Sepsis.

Katja Hanslin, Paul Skorup, Frida Wilske, Anders Larsson, Eva Tano, Jan Sjölin, Miklos Lipcsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katja HanslinAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-1683
Paul SkorupSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-6612
Frida WilskeSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anders LarssonSection of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-0402
Eva TanoSection of Clinical Bacteriology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-0769
Jan SjölinSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Miklos LipcseyAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1976-4129

Funding

Olinder-Nielsen Foundationthe Uppsala University Hospital Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe liver is essential for bacterial elimination, preventing intestinal bacteria from entering the systemic circulation, and for producing inflammatory cytokines. Glucocorticoids have been reported to exert heterogeneous effects on bacterial clearance in sepsis. Using a porcine model of gram-negative abdominal sepsis, we investigated how portal venous administration of budesonide, a glucocorticoid with extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism, affects hepatic bacterial and endotoxin elimination as well as the systemic inflammatory response, in comparison with systemic administration and no treatment.

methodsThe Portal Steroid-Sepsis (Sep-Port, n = 8) and Systemic Steroid-Sepsis (Sep-Syst, n = 8) groups were administered budesonide in the portal vein or systemically, followed by an E. coli infusion for 3 h in the portal vein. The Septic Controls (Sep-Ctrl, n = 8) received saline instead of budesonide. Non-septic Controls (NSep-Port, n = 3) were treated only with portal budesonide. Portal, arterial, and hepatic venous bacterial counts were analyzed hourly during the bacterial infusion. The levels of endotoxin and inflammatory cytokines were measured.

resultsThere was no difference in hepatic/portal venous bacterial count ratios. However, the arterial and hepatic venous bacterial counts were higher in the Sep-Syst compared to Sep-Port group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), while microbiological findings were similar in the Sep-Port and Sep-Ctrl groups. Hepatic endotoxin elimination did not differ between the groups. IL-10 levels were higher in the Sep-Port compared to the Sep-Syst group at 1 h (p < 0.01), and IL-6 levels were lower in the Sep-Port compared to the Sep-Ctrl after the bacterial infusion (p < 0.05).

conclusionsIn this experimental sepsis model, hepatic bacterial elimination was unaffected by portal or systemic budesonide, whereas systemic administration was associated with increased systemic bacterial levels. Endotoxin clearance was unaffected by budesonide. Portal budesonide elicited a more pronounced anti-inflammatory response compared to systemic administration. These findings suggest that hepatic exposure to budesonide may modulate the inflammatory response while limiting adverse effects on systemic bacterial clearance. EDITORIAL COMMENT: Glucocorticoids are widely used in sepsis management, yet their effects on bacterial clearance is incompletely understood. In this porcine model of gram-negative abdominal sepsis, portal venous delivery of budesonide (which has ~90% hepatic first-pass metabolism) preserved bacterial elimination and enhanced the early anti-inflammatory response, without the increase in systemic bacterial levels seen with systemic administration. These results demonstrate that route of delivery as a potentially important determinant of the risk-benefit balance of glucocorticoid therapy in sepsis, and support further investigation of hepatic-targeting strategies.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBudesonideImmunosuppressive AgentsLiverSepsisAnimalsCytokinesEndotoxinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemalePortal VeinSwineAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBudesonideCytokinesEndotoxinsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID42493472
PMCPMC13395631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.