Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493433›Full record

ReviewBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2026

[Current status of prostate cancer screening research].

Ming Liu, Huiling Chen, Zhengtong Lyu, Huimin Hou, Jiamin Sun

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ming LiuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Huiling ChenDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Zhengtong LyuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Huimin HouDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Jiamin SunDepartment of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common malignant tumor among men worldwide. Its early diagnosis relies on screening. How to increase the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer, avoid overdiagnosis and over-treatment of low-risk tumors, while also considering economic benefits, has become a core issue in the field of screening. Currently, international prostate cancer screening strategies are moving from a single prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening to individualized risk stratification, and exploring the roles of various stratification tools, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), new biomarkers, and risk prediction models. However, there is no universally recognized unified approach. In recent years, although the incidence of prostate cancer in China has increased rapidly, the early diagnosis rate is still low. This is directly related to the insufficient prevalence of prostate cancer screening in China. Moreover, China also faces problems such as the lack of a reasonable screening model for elderly high-risk populations, insufficient public awareness, and the absence of a refined screening path. Future work involves building stratified screening strategies suitable for the Chinese population based on Chinese data, promoting the transition of screening from opportunistic to systematic, and is a task that needs to be carried out.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass ScreeningProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsChinaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstate-Specific AntigenCommunity health serviceEarly cancer detectionMultiparametric nuclear magnetic resonanceProstate tumor

Identifiers

PMID42493433
PMCPMC13402079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.