ReviewBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2026
[Clinical application progress, hot topics, controversies and future prospects of segmental metallic ureteral stents].
Review in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ureteral stricture (US) is a common urological disease with complex etiologies, including benign and malignant lesions, iatrogenic injuries, and idiopathic factors. Without timely intervention, it can lead to upper urinary tract obstruction and progressive, irreversible renal impairment. Traditional re-constructive surgeries are often limited by high technical demands, significant surgical risks, and strict requirements for patient fitness. To address these challenges, segmental metallic ureteral stents (SMUSs) have gained prominence in recent years. Featuring a non-full-length design for targeted support, excellent radial strength, and a large caliber, SMUSs provide reliable drainage and allow for long-term retention. They effectively overcome the common drawbacks of traditional double-J stents, such as frequent encrustation, the need for regular replacement, and severe bladder irritation. Consequently, SMUSs have become a vital maintenance therapy for patients with malignant obstructions or those unsuitable for re-constructive surgery. Moreover, they have shown curative potential by providing long-term efficacy for certain benign strictures. However, due to the high heterogeneity of stricture etiologies, significant controversies and knowledge gaps remain in clinical practice. These mainly pertain to the precise selection of stent types for specific indications, the standardization of surgical implantation, optimal indwelling durations, and strategies for preventing and managing long-term complications. Drawing upon the latest global evidence-based medicine and large-sample follow-up data from our center, this article systematically reviews the clinical application and efficacy differences of SMUSs across malignant, benign, and radiotherapy-induced ureteral strictures. We provide an in-depth analysis of major ongoing clinical controversies and propose practical management strategies for complications leading to stent failure, including stent obstruction, migration, encrustation, recurrent infections, and high-risk ureteral fistulas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42493432PMC13402088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.