SynthesisJournal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology2026
Predicting Malignant Transformation in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Systematic Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Risk Models and Pathologist-Based Microscopy.
Synthesis in Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsRisk prediction models (RPMs) based on histopathological analysis of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) are increasingly used to stratify patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and support personalized management. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated artificial intelligence (AI)-based models compared with conventional human microscopy for predicting malignant transformation (MT).
methodsA total of 32 studies published between 1998 and 2026 were included (9 AI-based and 23 human-based), focusing on OED in oral leukoplakia (OL), erythroleukoplakia, and erythroplakia. AI approaches addressed prediction or prognostic tasks using machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), or hybrid methods, with multilayer perceptron and random forest among the most frequently used algorithms.
resultsMeta-analysis demonstrated strong discriminative performance for AI models (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 12.64; 95% CI: 5.65-28.26; I
conclusionsOverall, AI-based RPMs demonstrate promising and more reliable discriminative ability, primarily by improving decision precision rather than detection rates. However, further standardization, external validation, and larger multicentric datasets are required for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.