ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Neural Evidence for Action-Related Somatosensory Predictions.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tactile consequences of self-initiated movements are thought to be predicted by a forward model (FM), yet the precise neural implementation of these predictions remains unclear. In nonmotor contexts, expectations are thought to activate sensory neurons tuned toward the expected stimulus. This acts as a predictive template against which afferent sensory input is compared. It is unclear whether FM predictions have a similar neural instantiation. Here we employed time-resolved multivariate decoding on human electroencephalography during self-generated movements to examine the content of predictive neural activity. Human participants (males and females) performed index finger movements which were predictably paired with a vibration to either the index or ring finger of the opposite, passive hand. On some trials the tactile stimulus was unexpectedly omitted. Results revealed above-chance finger decoding in the premovement period supporting a predictive representation of expected stimulation location. As the movement approached, this predictive activity became similar to late-stage processing of a physical tactile stimulus. On omission trials, we found that despite the absence of afferent input, finger location could be decoded ∼120 ms after expected stimulus onset. This shows a stimulus-specific omission response. Together these findings indicate that self-generated movement preactivates neurons tuned toward expected tactile consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.