ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2026
Clinical Implications of CD19-Negative Relapse Following CD19-Directed Therapy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD19-directed therapy remains the mainstay treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, treatment patterns and outcomes following CD19-negative (CD19-) relapse remain poorly defined. We retrospectively analyzed 65 adult patients with ALL who developed CD19-relapse after CD19-directed therapy. TP53 mutations and BCR::ABL1-like ALL were each identified in 27.7% (n = 18) of patients. Forty-six patients (70.8%) received one CD19-targeted therapy, whereas 19 patients (29.2%) received ≥ 2 prior to CD19-relapse. Overall, 60 patients (92.3%) received blinatumomab, and 23 (35.4%) received CAR T-cell therapy. The median time from the initiation of the most recent CD19-targeted therapy to CD19-relapse was 155 days (range, 13-1946). The median follow-up of the entire cohort was 32.7 months (IQR, 15.1-90.3). The median event-free and overall survival (EFS and OS) was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.5-4.5) and 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.8-24.7), respectively. In multivariate analysis, receipt of ≥ 2 CD19-directed therapies was associated with both inferior EFS and OS, HR 2.17 (95% CI, 1.10-4.29; p = 0.03) and HR 3.05 (95% CI, 1.40-6.62; p = 0.005). The complete remission rate following first salvage therapy was 47.5% and 72.1% any time following CD19-relapse. Sixteen (34.8%) of 46 patients evaluated had subsequent CD19 re-expression, 5 of whom subsequently received CD19-directed therapy, and all 5 patients responded. Patients with ALL who develop CD19-relapse after CD19-directed therapy have poor outcomes and limited therapeutic options. However, since this study lacked a comparator cohort of patients with CD19-positive relapse, the independent prognostic impact of CD19 negativity could not be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.