Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42493205›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Co-development of a consensus-based pathway to improve access and outcomes for women seeking flat symmetry as an alternative to breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: Protocol for the UK FLAME study.

Eleanor Ferris, Sam Brunsden, Katherine Cowan, Katherine Fairhurst, Sue Hartup, Nicola King, Stuart McIntosh, Nicola Mills, Joanna Skillman, Samuel G Smith and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eleanor FerrisBristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Clinical Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Sam BrunsdenFlat Friends UK, London, UK.
Katherine CowanKatherine Cowan Consulting, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6348-786X
Katherine FairhurstBristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Clinical Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Sue HartupSt James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Nicola KingFlat Friends UK, London, UK.
Stuart McIntoshThe Johnston Cancer Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-9611
Nicola MillsPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-2940
Joanna SkillmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Samuel G SmithLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-4470
Philippa TollowUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Shelley PotterBristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Clinical Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK shelley.potter@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-312X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUp to 40% of women with breast cancer will require a mastectomy, and breast reconstruction is routinely offered to restore symmetry. While not all women want, or are suitable for, breast reconstruction, many want to be symmetrical following breast cancer surgery. For these women, contralateral mastectomy for 'flat symmetry' is a good alternative, but in the UK, access to contralateral 'symmetrising' mastectomy (CSM) is highly variable. Many women seeking this option describe feeling frustrated, unsupported and having to 'fight' to access care, while clinicians express concerns about decisional regret. The FLAME (FLat symmetry After Mastectomy for brEast cancer) study aims to work with key stakeholders to co-develop a consensus-based pathway to improve access and outcomes for women seeking CSM as an alternative to breast reconstruction after a unilateral mastectomy for breast cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pathway development will be underpinned by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for the development of complex interventions, informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour framework, complemented by Intervention Mapping. There will be six key stages: (1) creation of a logic model of the issues that need to be addressed with the CSM pathway using a systematic literature review, national practice surveys and qualitative interviews with key stakeholders; (2) definition of the logic model of change objectives (performance objectives, change determinants and change objectives); (3) pathway design informed by appropriate behaviour change techniques; (4) co-development of the pathway in a co-design workshop involving key stakeholders; (5) co-development of an implementation plan and (6) future evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Bristol Research Ethics Review Committee (ref: 27961). Written and verbal informed consent will be obtained from all participants before the interview study and again from individuals participating in the workshop. Findings will be presented at national/international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. Dissemination materials will be co-produced with key stakeholders and shared widely with professional associations and patient support organisations to promote uptake and implementation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealth Services AccessibilityMammaplastyMastectomyConsensusFemaleHumansResearch DesignUnited KingdomBreast surgeryBreast tumoursHealth Services Accessibility

Identifiers

PMID42493205
PMCPMC13404634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.