ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2026
A scalable touchscreen-based spatial working memory task for cross-species research.
Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The common marmoset is rapidly emerging as a powerful nonhuman primate model in neuroscience, yet the development of scalable, mechanistically informative cognitive paradigms has lagged behind advances in neural recording and genetic tools. Here, we introduce and validate a touchscreen-based spatial working memory task designed for direct cross-species translation between marmosets and humans. The paradigm independently manipulates retention delay and spatial separation between test choice stimuli, enabling parametric control over maintenance and interference demands within a single framework. Twelve marmosets and seventy-one human participants performed a Delayed Non-Match-to-Position task in which memory delay (1, 5, 10 s) and angular separation between target and distractor locations were systematically varied. Across species, accuracy declined as delay increased and as spatial separation decreased, demonstrating robust sensitivity to both maintenance demands and similarity-based interference. Critically, delay and separation interacted in both species, indicating that these had additive effects. Choice latency analyses further supported interpretation of performance, with slower responses on incorrect trials in both groups. Together, these findings establish a scalable and translationally aligned spatial working memory paradigm that captures interacting maintenance and interference processes. This task provides a powerful platform for circuit-level investigation and offers a sensitive cognitive assay for future studies of aging, neurodegenerative disease, and therapeutic intervention in the marmoset model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.