Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42492071›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mental health2026

A Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Education Intervention for Caregivers of Very Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kristin Harrison Ginsberg, Jane Alsweiler, Jenny Rogers, Alana Cavadino, Meihana Douglas, Anna Serlachius

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin Harrison GinsbergDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand, 64 (09) 923 5025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-3676
Jane AlsweilerDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand, 64 (09) 923 5025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-6654
Jenny RogersLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7275-4387
Alana CavadinoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-367X
Meihana DouglasSchool of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1433-0461
Anna SerlachiusDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-8351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Parents of very preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) experience high levels of psychological distress, yet access to timely, evidence-based mental health support is limited by staffing and resource constraints. Digital mental health interventions offer a scalable approach to addressing this gap; however, their effectiveness has not been well established in NICU caregiver populations, particularly during periods of acute stress. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-guided digital acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based intervention combined with NICU-specific education (NICU parent acceptance and commitment therapy [NPACT]). The study explored the intervention's effects on stress among parents and primary caregivers of very preterm infants, compared to a digital education-only intervention, and active control. Methods: We conducted a 3-arm, single-center, randomized controlled cluster trial in a tertiary NICU. Parents and primary caregivers of very preterm infants (<32 wk' gestational age,<1 wk old) were randomized by family cluster to (1) NPACT (ACT+ education), (2) a digital education-only intervention, or (3) active control. Digital interventions were delivered via a web-based platform over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was NICU-related stress on the Parent Stressor Scale: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (PSS:NICU) at 2 weeks postrandomization. Secondary outcomes included caregiver anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and selected neonatal outcomes. Engagement and perceived helpfulness were assessed for digital interventions. Results: A total of 102 caregivers from 68 family clusters (79 infants; mean gestational age 28.1, SD 2.2 wk) were enrolled. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the mean PSS:NICU scores at 2 weeks (NPACT 3.0, SD 0.9; education-only 2.5, SD 1; active control 2.6, SD 0.9; adjusted mean difference for NPACT vs active control 0.04, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.47). No between-group differences were observed for secondary psychological outcomes at any time point. However, caregivers in both digital intervention groups had higher odds of full breastfeeding at discharge compared with active control. Engagement with the digital interventions was high, with 97% (28/29) of NPACT participants and 76% (19/25) of education-only participants completing at least 5 of 7 modules, and both interventions were rated as very helpful. Conclusions: In this trial, an unguided digital mental health intervention delivered during NICU admission did not reduce NICU-specific parental stress or other psychological outcomes relative to active control. However, the intervention was highly used by caregivers. These findings suggest that while a brief digital mental health intervention can be successfully implemented in a high-stress clinical setting with caregivers, its capacity to reduce acute psychological distress may be limited. Secondary findings indicate potential benefits of the digital intervention on breastfeeding, generating hypotheses for future research. Digital mental health interventions in neonatal settings may be most effective when integrated within hybrid models of care and/or delivered beyond the acute admission phase.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyCaregiversInfant, Extremely PrematureParentsStress, PsychologicalAdultDigital MediaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleacceptance and commitment therapycaregiversdigital health interventiondigital mental healthneonatal intensive care unitpreterm infantsrandomized controlled trialstress

Identifiers

PMID42492071
PMCPMC13395256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.