ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026
Multidisciplinary Telehealth for Pediatric Developmental and Mental Health Care in Rural and Remote Australia: Interview Study Among Caregivers and Service Providers.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Geography and socioeconomic disadvantage impede access to appropriate services for rural and remote-dwelling children with complex developmental and mental health needs. Telehealth offers opportunities to increase access to essential health and well-being services for people with complex needs who live in rural and remote areas, whose experiences of mental ill-health are frequently compounded by social marginalization and economic disadvantage. Objective: This study aimed to describe caregivers' and service providers' perspectives on the challenges and value of telehealth services for rural and remote children by drawing on experiences within a specialist service (Royal Far West; RFW) that provides mental and developmental health services to rural and remote-dwelling children and families in Australia. Methods: Participants included a convenience sample of caregivers of children who use RFW services (n=11) and service providers from RFW (n=21). Deidentified interview transcript data were analyzed thematically using framework analysis. Results: Caregivers were generally enthusiastic about telehealth but acknowledged potential technological limitations and challenges to effectively engaging some children. While acknowledging its value and importance, RFW service providers identified additional challenges with providing telehealth, such as limited capacity for some detailed clinical assessments and potential child and family risk and safety issues. Conclusions: Telehealth remains a vital option within multidisciplinary services to improve access and outcomes for children in rural and remote communities who present with complex mental and developmental health needs. Despite challenges, rural and remote caregivers and RFW service providers identified telehealth as a beneficial, accessible, and effective component of multidisciplinary care for children with complex mental and developmental health needs. These caregiver and service provider perspectives will inform ongoing service development, research, and advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.