ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Structural Brain Correlates of Poor Reading Comprehension.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poor comprehenders (PCs) have typical word reading skill and intelligence but poorer than expected reading comprehension. While the prevalence of PCs is similar to that of poor decoders (individuals who struggle fluently converting written text into spoken language), less is known about the neurobiological substrates of poor comprehension. Extant studies have found small differences in gray matter volume between PCs and poor or typically reading peers. However, a detailed quantification of cortical morphometric features and white matter integrity remains unexplored. Data from 2,100 children (1,200 with imaging data), aged 8-16 years were analyzed to determine if there is a distinct neuroanatomy associated with poor reading comprehension across three common methods for classifying PCs. We computed gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and surface area, as well as white matter measures (mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, neurite orientation, and neurite density) for PCs and compared these measures with those of poor decoders and typical readers. Results revealed small but widespread white matter differences, but no gray matter differences between PCs and other readers. PCs showed decreased white matter integrity (increased mean diffusivity, decreased neurite density) in tracts previously associated with reading, including the superior longitudinal fasciculus and inferior longitudinal fasciculus, and in tracts that have been associated with cognitive performance such as the uncinate fasciculus. These results suggest that diffuse structural connectivity differences may underlie reading comprehension weaknesses in the face of intact decoding skills. This is consistent with the behavioral profile of PCs who exhibit a broad pattern of subclinical impairments in language and integrative cognitive processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.