In one paragraphArticle in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
17 authors.
Alexandra Martini de OliveiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1867-4495 Carolina Lopes Rodrigues VanettiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4834-7331 Fabiana AlencarUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9072-0361 Aline de Souza Gonçalves Gomes da ConceiçãoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9891-6730 Luana Dongue MartinezUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6030-1219 Lívea Carla Fidalgo Garcez Sant AnaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5590-7169 Claudia Lopes CarvalhoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4256-2170 Guilherme Prado MattarUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1938-3112 Vinícius LeducUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1170-3855 Ana Paula Assunção CecilioUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9211-3677 Vitor Nascimento de AlmeidaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-1424 Maria de Fátima Rebouças da SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8607-1851 Octávio Ribeiro GonçalvesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3622-6070 Bruna Luiza Roim VarottoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-2528 Elizabeth Prado Prestes Barra TeixeiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2266-8967 Orestes Vicente ForlenzaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, LIM27 - São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6962-5899 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Functional decline in activities of daily living (ADL) is considered a marker of ageing and Alzheimer's disease. However, there is a lack of performance-based instruments specifically designed to assess ADL in adults and older adults with Down syndrome. Objective: To describe the adaptation process of the Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS) to assess the functional capacity of adults with Down syndrome. Methods: The Direct Assessment of Functional Status-Brazilian Version (DAFS-BR) was administered to 15 adults with Down syndrome (nine men and six women) who were divided into two diagnostic groups: stable cognition and suspected dementia or cognitive impairment. The process was conducted in two phases: phase one was characterized by an adaptation in the tasks. In phase two, (cultural and semantic) equivalences were verified, as well as structural aspects, including layout and instructions. This phase was essential for verifying the applicability and comprehensibility of newly adapted tasks. Results: The DAFS-BR was adapted for the time orientation, communication (telephone use), moneyhandling skills, and shopping skills domains, considering the target population. Conclusion: The adaptation process of the DAFS-BR for people with Down syndrome was made considering linguistic, psychological, and cultural idiosyncrasies in the target population, with the input of experts with relevant experience in each domain. After psychometric studies, the Direct Assessment of Functional Status-Down Syndrome (DAFS-DS) could be considered the first ecological instrument for evaluating functional status in adults with Down syndrome in Brazil to enhance both clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Activities of Daily LivingDisability EvaluationFunctional StatusTrisomy 21
Identifiers
PMID42492000
PMCPMC13379224
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390