ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
The Temporal Dynamics of the Labeling Algorithm During Natural Language Comprehension: Neural Evidence for Phrase Grammatical Type Generation.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language, as a uniquely human faculty, combines words into hierarchical phrases with diverse syntactic-semantic relations (e.g., subject-predicate and modifier-head phrases). These phrase types are theoretically generated through the labeling algorithm at the syntax-semantics interface. Nevertheless, previous research has focused predominantly on the syntactic system, whereas the neural basis and temporal dynamics of labeling remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we developed the Head-Anchored Labeling Manipulation approach. This method manipulates labeling by embedding the same Mandarin noun-verb dual-category words as heads in tightly controlled modifier-head constructions, where the head alone determines the phrase's grammatical type. The representational similarity analysis of EEG data revealed that labeling representations emerged during both the early and middle stages: 192-227, 290-318, 330-360, and 385-416 ms following the dual-category word. Labeling emerged as early as ~200 ms, concurrent with syntactic Merge, and continued into the N400 window. These results demonstrate that labeling dynamically links syntax to conceptual-intentional system and generates phrase types by determining the constituent head. Its early engagement challenges syntax-first models and supports parallel interactive accounts. Moreover, combinability representations (520-596 and 604-632 ms), together with a late event-related brain potential negativity (420-700 ms) elicited by the dual-category word in the baseline condition, reflect increased difficulty in reconciling semantic associations with atypical syntactic configurations. Together, these findings provide clear electrophysiological evidence for the temporal dynamics of labeling and elucidate the processes at the syntax-semantics interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.