ArticleSleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
The Power of Language in the Criteria for Restless Leg Syndrome: A Latin American Perspective.
Article in Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing the Understanding of Restless Legs Syndrome in Latin America: A Response to Lopes et al.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adapting the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Guidelines for restless legs syndrome (RLS) to Latin America is a complex challenge, given the region's 33 countries and vast socioeconomic diversity. Such an endeavor requires comprehensive data and consensus from a broader representation of these populations. There is a need to assess the effect of social vulnerability on the prevalence of symptoms of periodic leg movements that may be erroneously called RLS and mimic the primary nosological diagnosis for itself. We aim to discuss the Asociación Lationoamericana de Sueño's (Latin American Sleep Association, ALADS, in Spanish) position statement to contextualize the 2025 AASM clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of RLS and periodic limb movement disorder. Their intention of advocating for future systematic studies employing standardized criteria in Latin America. While the Scientific Committee for Sleep Disorders of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology partially endorses those opinions, offering some counterpoints concerning, especially, the following issues: 1) challenges to the reportedly wide variability in Latin American RLS prevalence, with apparently very high prevalences exceeding the expected values in some locations; 2) the importance of complementing clinical history with structured RLS diagnostic questionnaires; and 3) amendments to the proposed summary of treatment recommendations, particularly regarding Iron supplementation. Finally, the presence of comorbidities and RLS in epidemiological studies must be considered and data from Latin America can contribute to the discussion on global criteria applied worldwide for RLS that need to be revised according to regional, social, and cultural issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.