ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Prescribing Errors in Iraqi Intensive and Cardiac Care Units: A Qualitative Investigations of Pharmacists' Perceptions, Determining Factors, Outcomes and Management Strategies.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of the Medication Adherence Scale for Iraqi Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (MASIPRA): A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prescribing errors are common in critical care units (CRCU) in developing countries. Little is known about the causes of these errors and the pharmacists' role in preventing and managing them in Iraqi hospitals. Objective: To get an in-depth understanding of the perspectives and practice of Iraqi pharmacists regarding prescribing errors in CRCU. Methods: A descriptive-qualitative study was conducted through face-to-face interviews with a consensus sample of pharmacists who have been working at the CRCU of Al-Husain Hospital in Al-Muthanna city/Iraq for at least 3 months. The interviews were conducted in Arabic using a validated semi-structured guide. The data were analyzed using thematic-analysis. Results: Sixteen pharmacists participated in the study, and three themes emerged. The first theme explored pharmacists' perceptions and experiences of prescribing errors in CRCU, with most pharmacists viewing these errors as common and potentially harmful to patients. The second theme focused on the types and determinants of prescribing errors, with drug-drug interactions, dosing errors, and irrational prescribing identified as the main types; pharmacists perceived that such errors are often physician-related, stemming from negligence and limited competence, and institution-related, due to patient workload and medication shortages. The third theme addressed the detection, prevention, and management of prescribing errors, with all pharmacists reporting the use of websites and general mobile applications for error detection and resolution. Most pharmacists indicated informing the responsible physician about the errors and leaving the correction decision to the physician's discretion. Additionally, most participants recommended enhancing physicians' skills through targeted training and developing specialized applications to support physicians in managing CRCU patients. Conclusion: Participating pharmacists considered prescribing errors, mainly dosing and drug-interactions, to be common in CRCU. They attributed these errors to physician negligence, limited competence, and workload. Pharmacists are using general applications for error detection. To reduce these errors, implementing targeted training and developing specialized applications are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.