ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
The Role of the Anterior Temporal Lobe in Reading: An HD-tDCS Study.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The anterior temporal lobe (ATL) is suggested as a semantic hub that may support reading inconsistent words via semantic access. Surface alexia is characterized by difficulty in reading these inconsistent words, and often co-occurs with ATL atrophy and semantic impairments. However, the role of ATL in word reading is unclear, as evidenced by cases of alexia without semantic impairments and semantic impairments without surface alexia. To test its role in reading, we stimulated the ATL using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in neurotypical participants performing a Word Naming task including consistent and inconsistent words, and a Picture Plausibility (PP) task involving nonverbal semantic judgments. We also stimulated the left tempo-occipital cortex (TOC) during the PP task. Low-frequency inconsistent words were read more slowly than high-frequency inconsistent words in the sham condition. This interaction disappeared with ATL stimulation. We found an interaction between consistency and stimulation in the low-frequency subset, but not in the high-frequency subset. In the PP task, ATL stimulation had no effect, whereas TOC stimulation significantly influenced reaction time. These findings support the left ATL's role in reading inconsistent words, aligning with surface alexia with ATL atrophy. The results also suggest that the left lateral ATL may be involved in lexical rather than purely semantic processes, consistent with lesion studies demonstrating a dissociation between semantic impairments and surface alexia, and possibly also with graded modality-specific specialization of bilateral ATLs. These findings reconcile conflicting findings and elucidate the role of left lateral ATL in reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.