Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491860›Full record

ArticleCommunications in statistics: Simulation and computation2025

Consensus spectral clustering with weighted similarity functions for single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Xiaodan Zhu, Zhide Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications in statistics: Simulation and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaodan ZhuBiostatistics & Data Science Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, United States.
Zhide FangBiostatistics & Data Science Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, United States.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI JUDD E SHELLITO · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we explore unsupervised clustering algorithms on real-world single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets. While single-cell RNA sequencing technologies have revolutionized the ability to profile gene expression at the resolution of individual cells, providing unprecedented insights into cellular heterogeneity and revealing previously undetectable rare cell subpopulations, the high dimensionality, sparsity, and noise inherent to scRNA-seq data pose significant challenges for traditional clustering methods in accurately delineating distinct cell types, states, and trajectories from the transcriptomic profiles. Conventional algorithms often struggle to capture the complex structure and geometry of single-cell gene expression landscapes and can be sensitive to the curse of dimensionality or fail to account for non-linear manifold structures underlying the data. In this study, we propose random sampling-based consensus clustering framework with the manifold-based spectral clustering to predict cluster numbers. Furthermore, the geodesic distance measure and two weighting measures are integrated into the generally used similarity kernel to enhance clustering performance on scRNA-seq data. We found that, when applied to scRNA-seq datasets with different types of variations, the geodesic distance-based similarity kernel with a discrete weighting measure performs best on datasets having discrete variations.

Indexed as

Clusteringgeodesic distancemanifold structuresimilarity kernelsingle-cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID42491860
PMCPMC13379047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.