ReviewPublic health reviews2026
Perceived barriers and facilitators of accessing statutory and non-statutory services, in disadvantaged communities, in England: a co-produced qualitative review.
Review in Public health reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This review explored the perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing statutory and non-statutory health and social care services among disadvantaged populations in England. Community-based services delivered by statutory bodies and the voluntary, community, faith, and social enterprise (VCSFE) sector are critical for addressing social determinants of health, fostering resilience, and promoting equity. However, in disadvantaged areas, complex needs and structural exclusion frequently limit their effectiveness. Methods: Co-produced with academics, VCFSE sector, and public contributors, this review synthesised qualitative research published since 2003, drawing on first-hand accounts of service users to explore how intersecting forms of disadvantage affect service access. Results: The review identified four themes influencing access to community-based services among disadvantaged groups: structural and informational barriers, the impact of cultural, social, and economic contexts, institutional trust and continuity, and emotional motivators and barriers. Conclusion: Improving access to community-based services requires structural and cultural alignment with users' lives. Services ought to prioritise flexibility, trust, and navigational support while addressing emotional and institutional barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.