ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Experience of workplace violence among clinical faculty members of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorkplace violence is considered an important and common issue in organizations related to the provision of health services. The aim of this study was to explain the experiences of violence toward clinical faculty members. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, inductive content analysis was conducted with nine clinical faculty members (six specialists and three subspecialists) of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences with at least 6 months of experience working in clinical settings. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, coded, categorized, and analyzed. In order to strengthen the study, the Guba and Lincoln criteria were used.
resultsData analysis showed that there were four main themes (Causes of violence, Experience of violence, Consequences of Violence, Controlling violence), five subthemes (Society, System, Cause of violence, Type of violence, Complications of Violence, Ways to prevent and deal with violence), and 19 subcategories, which were extracted from 4100 codes after in-depth analysis.
conclusionAmong the most important factors are the importance of the role of the social environment, the service delivery system, and ethics. The social environment can be categorized into factors such as economic and social conditions, advertising and the spread of false beliefs through the media, patients, and their companions. The ethical principles of doctors, patients, and companions can also be categorized as factors related to violence. It is suggested that a training program be developed and implemented to empower staff in healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.