Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491790›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026

An Offer You Can't Refuse: Opportunities for Intraprofessional Collaboration Learning in the Workplace.

Maarten van der Ven, Isa Wijnands, Natasja Looman, Esther de Groot, Cornelia Fluit, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Dieneke van Asselt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maarten van der VenGeriatric Medicine Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-7551
Isa WijnandsGeriatric Medicine Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0754-9754
Natasja LoomanPrimary & Community Care Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2104-6449
Esther de GrootJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University Medical center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0388-385X
Cornelia FluitDepartment of Research on Learning and Education, Radboud University Medical Center Health Academy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-9339
Wietske Kuijer-SiebelinkSchool of Education, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7009-3378
Dieneke van AsseltGeriatric Medicine Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2438-9495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Intraprofessional collaboration (IntraPC) competencies are invaluable in the care for older adults with complex care needs, but these competencies are not acquired automatically. IntraPC learning requires explicit attention in postgraduate training, where learning usually occurs in the workplace. However, both residents and supervisors struggle with how to incorporate IntraPC learning into daily practice. This study explored how and to what extent current resident-supervisor dialogues (RSDs) provide opportunities for IntraPC learning and explored barriers to IntraPC workplace learning. Methods: In this focused ethnography, we observed RSDs in the geriatric medicine department of a Dutch university medical center, focusing on opportunities for learning about IntraPC in the workplace. After each observation, both the resident and supervisor participated in in-depth interviews to reflect on the observed behavior. Data were then analyzed through inductive coding followed by thematic analysis. Subsequently, themes were discussed during two focus groups to enable collective reflection with research participants. Results: Although ample IntraPC learning opportunities were observed in the current RSDs, they remained underutilized. Participants reported dynamics between residents and supervisors that could obstruct IntraPC learning, including perceived time constraints, feedback misalignment between resident and supervisor, monitoring-focus, and the struggle for entrustment. Discussion: IntraPC learning opportunities in RSDs often remain implicit, even though addressing IntraPC learning does not necessarily require additional supervision time. This implicit learning limits reflection on current collaborative practices. Moreover, dynamics between residents and supervisors may hinder the explicit development of IntraPC competencies. To support improvements in IntraPC learning, supervisors and residents are encouraged to regard IntraPC practices as an important learning topic within RSDs.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorWorkplaceFocus GroupsGeriatricsHumansInternship and ResidencyInterprofessional RelationsLearningNetherlandsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42491790
PMCPMC13378418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.