Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491775›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of veterinary research2025

Efficacy of enoxacin and levofloxacin against

A S Prajapati, H H Panchasara, A N Suthar, B Das, A C Patel, S H Raval, P T Sutaria, K J Ankuya, R M Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A S PrajapatiDivision of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Clinical Complex (Veterinary Medicine), College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388001, Gujarat, India.
H H PanchasaraLivestock Research Station, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar-385506, Gujarat, India.
A N SutharDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar-385506, Gujarat, India.
B DasDepartment of Clinics (Veterinary Parasitology), College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar-385506, Gujarat, India.
A C PatelDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388001, Gujarat, India.
S H RavalDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar-385506, Gujarat, India.
P T SutariaDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar-385506, Gujarat, India.
K J AnkuyaDepartment of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar-385506, Gujarat, India.
R M PatelDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar-385506, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Theileriosis is a tick-borne disease that significantly hampers livestock industries in developing nations. Buparvaquone is the only available option for the management of theileriosis. On the other hand, drug use or organism evolution has led to the evolution of resistance over past twenty years. Treatment for theileriosis requires alternative therapeutic approaches. Aims: This work examined the in-vitro effectiveness of enoxacin and levofloxacin compounds against Methods: The schizont infected cell line was established from infected cattle blood. The inhibitory effects of both drugs were assessed on Results: Enoxacin and levofloxacin efficiently inhibited 50% of the infection at 1,71,723 µM and 10,084 µM, respectively. Levofloxacin showed encouraging results during the experiment. For enoxacin and levofloxacin, the 50% cytotoxic effects were also measured at 10,529 µM and 10,116 µM, respectively. Enoxacin was safe on bovine red blood cells with an HC Conclusion: Levofloxacin showed satisfactory results compared to enoxacin. Further study is required along with other parameters to evaluate and assess the inhibitory activity of enoxacin and levofloxacin.

Indexed as

CytotoxicityEnoxacinIn-vitroLevofloxacinTheileria annulata

Identifiers

PMID42491775
PMCPMC13378055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.