ArticleCureus2026
The Paradox of Support: Mechanical Ventilation-Induced Hypoxemia Through a Patent Foramen Ovale.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is common and usually harmless, but can cause significant positional and refractory hypoxemia in situations when there is a significant right-to-left shunt across it, and this phenomenon often goes unnoticed, especially in patients on ventilators, in whom it can be fatal. Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (POS) is a condition characterized by positional dyspnea (platypnea) and hypoxemia (orthodeoxia), usually associated with right-to-left interatrial shunting across a PFO or an atrial septal defect (ASD). The positional variation is believed to be due to interatrial stretch, facilitating right-to-left shunt across PFO. We report a 79-year-old woman with longstanding dyspnea, obstructive sleep apnea, and a remote history of pulmonary embolism on chronic anticoagulation who was admitted with worsening hypoxia that did not improve with bronchodilators, steroids, or oxygen therapy. Her workup, including chest computed tomography (CT) angiography, was unremarkable. Clinically, she continued to worsen, leading to severe respiratory failure requiring intubation with high oxygen and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) requirements. Cardiac workup revealed a large PFO with right-to-left shunting, and its subsequent closure with an Amplatzer device led to rapid improvement in oxygen levels and prompt extubation. PFO should be considered in anyone with positional dyspnea and hypoxemia or persistent refractory hypoxemia despite being on adequate ventilatory support. Early closure can be highly effective in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.