ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Scene graph-guided uncertainty decomposition improves confidence calibration in surgical visual question answering.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable confidence estimation is essential for surgical visual question answering because overconfident errors may compromise clinical decision support in high-risk settings. However, existing methods typically model predictive uncertainty as a single global quantity, which fails to capture the hierarchical uncertainty arising from ambiguous objects, uncertain tool-tissue interactions, and complex scene context. To address this limitation, we propose a scene graph-guided framework that decomposes uncertainty into object-level, relation-level, and scene-level components and adaptively fuses them for confidence-aware surgical visual question answering. The framework further incorporates Dirichlet-based calibration to improve probabilistic quality and support selective answering. Experiments on the Surgical Scene Graph-Question Answering (SSG-QA) benchmark show that the proposed method achieves an overall accuracy of 63.58%, an Expected Calibration Error of 16.97%, and a Risk-Coverage AUC of 0.0861. Our SG-UD framework achieves competitive calibration performance, significantly improving Brier Score and NLL over baselines, while providing more granular uncertainty interpretability. Performance improves across all question types, with the largest gain observed for relation-type questions (+0.92% over MCAN). Ablation studies further show that uncertainty decomposition contributes most to answer accuracy (+0.70%), whereas Dirichlet calibration is critical for improving probabilistic quality. These findings indicate that explicitly modeling uncertainty across semantic levels can enhance the reliability and interpretability of surgical visual question answering and provide fine-grained confidence information for safer artificial intelligence-assisted surgical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.