Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491753›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery open2026

Post-surgical functional outcomes in patients exhibiting different topographical variants of Lumber epidural varicose veins: a retrospective analysis.

Kayode Agboola, Bipin Chaurasia, Eugene Slinko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kayode AgboolaDepartment of Spinal Pathologies, Romodanov Institute of Neurosurgery, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-2072
Eugene SlinkoDepartment of Spinal Pathologies, Romodanov Institute of Neurosurgery, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar epidural varicose veins (LEVVs) are an uncommon yet clinically significant cause of lumbar radiculopathy, with an incidence between 0.067% and 1.2%. These venous dilations within the epidural space can compress neural structures, leading to pain and functional impairment. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative functional outcomes in patients with distinct topographical variants of LEVV - diffuse (DVV), local (LVV), and segmental (SVV) - across two time intervals to assess the evolution of clinical management and recovery trends. Methodology: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from two distinct cohorts: Data Set A (1999-2005, Results: Functional outcomes differed significantly between the two time periods. In Data Set A, the mean disability score was 18%, with no significant association between varicose vein type (VVT) and functionality ( Conclusion: Diffuse varicose veins were consistently associated with greater postoperative disability compared to local and segmental variants, emphasizing the prognostic relevance of anatomical classification in surgical outcomes. The findings underscore the need for tailored surgical strategies and standardized long-term follow-up to optimize functional recovery in LEVV patients. Further multicentric prospective studies are warranted to validate these observations and refine management protocols.

Indexed as

epidural varicose veinsepidural veinslumbar stenosisspine problems

Identifiers

PMID42491753
PMCPMC13378749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.