ReviewCureus2026
Precision Nursing Device Management and Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Early Warning Systems for Central Nervous System Infections in the Neurocritical Care Unit: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) infections and clinically overlapping neuroinflammatory conditions in the neurocritical care unit (neuro-ICU) are associated with profound mortality and prolonged clinical burdens. Invasive neuromonitoring devices, particularly external ventricular drains (EVDs), significantly increase the risk of infection, while delayed clinical manifestations often hinder early recognition and intervention. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the current landscape of precision nursing device management and artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated early warning systems (EWS) for CNS infections in the neuro-ICU, rather than to definitively evaluate their clinical effectiveness. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework, a systematic search of four major databases was conducted. Eligibility criteria included studies focusing on adult patients in the neuro-ICU. A rigorous multi-round filtration process was applied. A total of 24 eligible studies, encompassing longitudinal nursing management cohorts, quality improvement protocols, and machine learning predictive models, were meticulously selected for data extraction and narrative synthesis. The systematic optimization of EVD care bundles, specifically the reduction of routine cerebrospinal fluid sampling and the implementation of closed needleless systems, significantly decreased device-related infection rates, occasionally achieving zero infections under optimal interdisciplinary rounding conditions. Furthermore, AI-driven EWS algorithms (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost {Seattle, WA: University of Washington}) and non-invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform clustering demonstrated exceptional prognostic accuracy. These advanced models successfully predicted ventriculitis up to 24 h prior to positive bacterial cultures. The management of severe complications, such as paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, remains heavily reliant on continuous evidence-based nursing vigilance. The integration of AI-driven predictive modeling with standardized, precision nursing bundles represents a paradigm shift from reactive treatment to proactive prevention in neurocritical care. Translating these technologies into bedside clinical decision support systems will be pivotal in optimizing individualized patient outcomes and redefining neuro-ICU nursing standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.