Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491691›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2026

Pain Rehabilitation Virtual Reality (PR-VR) at Home: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Youth with Chronic Pain.

Giulia Mesaroli, Richard Xi, Petra Hroch Tiessen, Uttara Kurup, Fareha Nishat, Tieghan Killackey, Ewa Sucha, Laura E Simons, Samantha Stephens, Fiona Campbell and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04912817 (Pain Rehabilitation Virtual Reality), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04912817 nacompletednot on this map

Pain Rehabilitation Virtual Reality (PR-VR) At-home Program: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine Feasibility and Impact on Pain and Function in Adolescents During and After COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsPain, ChronicArmsOff the Shelf VR, Custom VR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giulia MesaroliChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Richard XiChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Petra Hroch TiessenDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Uttara KurupChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Fareha NishatChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Tieghan KillackeyPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Ewa SuchaChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Laura E SimonsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, USA.
Samantha StephensChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Fiona CampbellDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer StinsonChild Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-8052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain Rehabilitation Virtual Reality (PR-VR) is a novel tool designed to engage youth with chronic pain in exercise as a part of physiotherapy. PR-VR has been evaluated in day-treatment and outpatient settings, but not for at home use. Aims: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and safety of PR-VR at home for youth with chronic pain. An exploratory aim evaluated the preliminary effectiveness of PR-VR on pain and disability. Methods: This was a 3-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (registration #NCT04912817). Each study arm included four 60-min physiotherapy sessions via Zoom (1: commercially available VR; 2: custom-developed PR-VR; 3: standard physiotherapy care). Feasibility metrics included enrollment, accrual, and drop-out rates. Acceptability was measured via satisfaction surveys and qualitative interviews. Pain and disability were measured via self-report, physical performance, and actigraphy. Results: Thirty-seven of 70 eligible patients approached were enrolled and randomized (53% enrollment rate, 100% accrual rate), including 28 females (76%) aged 10-17 years. Twenty-eight participants completed the study (33% drop-out rate; reasons include pain resolution, medical complexity, dissatisfaction with assignment to control). Ten minor adverse events were reported across study arms. Participants and physiotherapists expressed high levels of VR acceptability. Of the participants who completed arms 1 and 2 (n = 17), 94% were satisfied/very satisfied with VR and 100% rated VR as easy/very easy to use. Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrate the safety and acceptability of VR in pediatric pain rehabilitation. These feasibility results will inform the design of future large-scale trials, including consideration of a wait-list control group. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04912817.

Indexed as

chronic painpediatricphysiotherapyrehabilitationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42491691
PMCPMC13378713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.