Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491679›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Ophthalmologists' Perceptions of the Impact of Patient Mental Status on Clinical Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Kenji Kashiwagi, Hiroshi Kasai, Yoshiko Fukuda, Shuhei Hosoda, Naohiko Tanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenji KashiwagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8506-8503
Hiroshi KasaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yoshiko FukudaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Shuhei HosodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Naohiko TanabeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate ophthalmologists' perceptions of how patients' mental status influences ophthalmic clinical practice and to identify ocular diseases perceived by ophthalmologists as having the greatest psychological impact. Subjects and Methods: This exploratory cross-sectional questionnaire survey included 61 ophthalmologists from a regional ophthalmologists' association in Japan (41 men and 20 women; mean clinical experience, 26 ± 14 years). Participants rated the extent to which they considered patients' mental status during treatment selection using a 10-point scale (1 = not considered at all; 10 = maximal consideration). The survey assessed perceived treatment-related changes in patient mental status, clinical domains perceived to be influenced by mental status, experiences of perceived clinical impact due to insufficient psychological consideration, and ocular diseases perceived to impose the greatest psychological burden. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with reporting perceived clinical impact. Results: The mean mental health attention score was 7.0 ± 1.8 (range, 2-10). Fifty-five physicians (90.2%) reported experiencing treatment-related changes in patients' mental status. The clinical domains most frequently selected as being influenced by patient mental status were disease explanation, healthcare-seeking behavior, surgical decision-making, and medication management. Thirty-two physicians (52.5%) reported that insufficient attention to patient mental health had affected clinical care. Higher mental health attention scores were independently associated with reporting perceived clinical impact (odds ratio, 1.45 per 1-point increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.01; p = 0.02). Glaucoma was most frequently ranked as the ocular diseases perceived by ophthalmologists as being associated with the greatest psychological burden, followed by retinitis pigmentosa. Conclusion: Ophthalmologists in this sample perceived patient mental status as relevant to clinical practice, particularly in chronic progressive diseases such as glaucoma and inherited retinal disorders. Because this survey assessed physician perceptions rather than patient-reported mental health or objective clinical outcomes, future studies incorporating validated mental health instruments, patient-reported outcomes, and objective clinical endpoints are needed.

Indexed as

clinical decision-makingglaucomamental healthophthalmologyphysician perceptionssurvey

Identifiers

PMID42491679
PMCPMC13378507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.