ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Will artificial intelligence change medical life? Bridging the gap between innovation and medical student adoption: a cross-sectional study among university medical students.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence and robotics are transforming healthcare by improving diagnosis, treatment, and personalized medicine. Understanding medical students' and faculty perceptions is essential for effective integration into medical education. This study examines the benefits, limitations, and impact of AI on clinical practice, education, and healthcare delivery. This research investigates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, highlighting its advantages and limitations, with emphasis on its applications in various clinical fields and its influence on medical education and healthcare delivery. Methods: Across-sectional study was conducted involving 441 medical students at Tanta University. Data was gathered by using a structured pretested self-administered questionnaire, developed from the literature, and validated by experts. It covered sociodemographic characteristics, perceptions toward AI in medical education, and knowledge and attitudes regarding AI use in healthcare. Results: The survey revealed that 95.9% of participants have heard about AI, primarily through media (77.8%). with 76.0% showing a favorable attitude. Most students (58.3%) reported learning about AI through online communities and forums. However, only 37.9% learned AI techniques through courses or training. Less than one quarter (23.8%) consider Chatbot for student support the most useful. The most frequently reported benefit was its ability to speed up the management process (46.3%), followed by its capacity to capture and analyze more information than humans (42.9%) and its potential to reduce medical errors (42.9%). Students raised concerns about reduced independent thinking (52.6%) and limited interpersonal skills (47.4%). The main barriers identified were lack of proper training (51.9%), limited financial resources (49%), and lack of awareness (47.6%). Conclusion: Medical students showed high awareness and positive attitudes toward AI but had limited formal training. They recognized its benefits in learning and clinical practice while expressing ethical concerns regarding ethics, reduced human interaction, and accountability. These findings highlight the need to incorporate structured AI education into medical curricula, emphasizing both technical competencies and ethical frameworks, to prepare future physicians for safe and effective AI adoption in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.